Deja Vu

Hahaha I know we're having a new crop of fresh graduates from "University of Intellectuals".well neither do the swallowing the scientific results and not intending to think about its great helping hands towards the destruction are gonna fetch us the solutions. With due respect I didn’t exactly count the number of paragraphs or the number of lines, where I asked you to think or so but I am not asking you to think I know its beyond you. People fight over hell lot of issues, you just can't relate it simply to religion. We all know people do die 'cause of religion, but people perhaps a lot more die beacuse of "Bizali ke jhatkey", nuclear bombs, chemical weapons, global warming and hole in ozone layer, what are you gonna do about it? whip chemistry and physics off. I am not against Science, I am myself an elec. engg from IIT. Where there is power, there is abuse of Power and Religion is the most powerful thing.
It depends on the people how they use or deal with it. It's rahter unfortunate people always go for the darker side, they are too blind to see the brighter side. Its quite evident that you too fail to see the depth of religion. You know about Bin Laden but you don't want to talk about Gandhi who controlled all this bloodshed on the west side during partition with Geeta in one hand and Quraan in the other.

You want to buy that cookie 'cause you're born and brought up in a society which talks about humanity, mercy, tolerance which comes from nothing but religion.

It's weird that you relate my comment with any kind of regionalism. I'd not comment on that.

i don't know why you ain't getting it but as far as I think you can't do a tripple inetgration problem just because you want to and you are concerned about it, you gotta have an understanding of Maths and a background in Maths. It's not rocket science and same is the case with society. If you don;t understand and respect their beliefs and values then may be you should.

In all that jugglery of adjectives you did in all those lines, you persistently seem to sing that “you are a fascist” song which is kind of funny, ‘cause as far as I understand, one of the very important feature of FASCISM is anti-conservative nationalism and mine is “conservative nationalism” but I tell ya what, Fascist is more of an epithet of contemporary era. People use it for addressing their political or ideological enemies. In “What is Fascism?”, George Orwell says .

“The word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation,of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else... almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’.”

So this fascist word doesn't mean nothing to me. It's for everybody, it's like you know I am your fasicts and you are my fascist. You questioned my question but eventually you did talk about that communal voilence.


Well I tell you writers who pondered the society and its grievances in their creations and they got respect, but again people who just advocate western ideolgies which don't suit our system. What hell have they done apart from criticising and making fuss about the contemporary system?

and on the last thing which you found funny had a lot of things

1. I don't and didn't bring up the personal relationships, you did.

2. My leaders don't have sons and wives, they are full time nationalists.

3. Like the way you feel for your mother, there are people who do feel the same for Mother India and Maa Sarswati.

4. Like you said "you don't know why your name is Rama, it could have been Spiderman or anything". But it's Rama and you don't know why. That was my whole point.


at the end you still haven't disclosed your ideolgy, your execution plan or anything.

intellectuality ke thekedaar

Questioning religion or an ideology doesn't take more than an ounce from your cask of intellectuality.

you want to question God, you just got to say "why do people worship god when they haven't seen The God"

you want to question religion, you just got to say "look Hindu muslims are fighting over mandir maszid, what's the point"

you want to question reservation, you just got to say "look that guy got 60% in 12th standard and still graduating from a medical college just 'cause he comes from a particular section of society"

you want to question feminism, you just got to say "ohh look Sania Mirza's boobs are popping out"

i want to question SCIENCE i just got to say "i have never seen a fuckin' electron, whole electrical engineering is nothing bull fuckin' society manufactured crap"

(I assume you understand that if you would try to justify it by some theories and mathematical equations based on assumptions like 2*2 is 4 or 60 seconds make a minute then we've Vedas, Upnishad, Quran and Bible, if you'd you can feel an electric shock then there are people who'd say and do say that they can feel mighty God)

If theory of creation is shitolad then i don't see any thing more stupid then a theory which says life started with a fuckin' cell then they became fish and the monkey the fuckin man, it's fuckin' nothing but genuine crap. If Jesus Christ was not intelligent enough then Charles Darwin was also a dickhead.

but talkin' about all this is, writing on your blog about religion and feminism is one thing

and

visiting a village in North India and seeing the status of Brhamin, Thakur and underprivileged class is whole different thing.

go to Sawaimadhaapur and Bundi in Rajsthan you'd look at women's status you'd understand female and feminism

go to Kashi, Mathura, Chitrkoot, Azmer you'd get a less mirky picture of people's faith.

All people are not rich and intellectual enough to go through western thoughts and read Richard Dawkins and Karl Marx and follow Lev Kamenev, here people follow and talk about Swami vivekanand Ji, Gnadhi, Patel, Bose people those who were inspired by Ramayana Shrimad BhagwadGeeta and Vedas.

An ideology, a concept is pure fuckshit if it doesn't suit the people, if it doesn't slip through people's throat.

Communisim आता है , चला जाता है . धर्मं वहीँ रहता है .
It's been here in India since the birth of human race.

Definitely there should be reforms but if you wipe this system off this planet you must come with a new ideolgy, new thoery and of course new plan.

If you don't understand people, their feelings their faith then you shouldn't be worried about them and wasting your time with thinking of religion and shit.Get up,go to your job, come back have your dinner and sleep. People and society are fine with or without you.


If you want to talk about society then you better have a look at it, it's status and it's need.

Reading Franz Kafka and scribbling in attractive English is something majority got nothin' to do with. All this would make you an intellectual, Sobha De, Mahesh Bhatt or yogendra yadav and trust me they don't exist beyond Mumbai, Banglore or Delhi.

and I'd like not to get harsh and wouldn't use unparliamentary language but since you brought my mother into all this (Fuck your motherfucking boyfriend) I'd like to ask you did you tell yer mother about yer views and her stupidity 'cause she named ya Rama? if you didn't yet then may be you should and now since you've gained all the knowledge then you should get it changed. All you need is a Rs. 10 ka affidavit. This "all this is society manufactured" might be cool, may be beneficial for ya at max. but it's not meant and healthy for the whole society. Everything is society manufactured. Everyfuckinthing not just racism or sex discrimination are society manufactured concepts values of human life, mercy, charity, humanity all this is society manufactured. And Gangotri of this Ganga is RELIGION. It takes no great intelligence that RELIGION is also a society manufactured concept but we need things to tame the society and avoid chaos. When you think it's bad to rape a woman , or hurt someone or to kill the inocents. It's the RELIGION. Roots are way to more deeper than what you think. No matter how hard we try we can't think out of the box, we're always inside that box.
Roots of religion are way to more deeper than what you think, that's why yer name is Rama

composed by pranoo

woh yaad dhundhti hai
awaaz dhundti hai
jis mahal ke kinaro mein goonjte hai woh lavaz
unke thikane meri fariyaad dhundti hai

kin gaalion kin shehero mein talab dikhate
is ruh ki kin tasveeron se tadap bhujate
yeh sheher nahi hai mera
yeh jag nahi hai mera
yeh ganga jo nahi meri
kis nadikinare se hum yeh pyaas bhujate

kuch thahar sa gaya hai man mein
kuch ruk sa gaya aadmi mein
jhansi aur shivaji ke vansh yeh log
kyun dhoodhe victoria ka pyaar

kuch ghum gaya hai vyakti mein
kuch thum sa gaya us ruh mein
jo kabhi likte the inquilab zindabad
kyun aaj duniya jala rahe hai

en hatao mein jo asha thi
ek chingari hai dard ki
en aankhon mein jo farz tha
ek khwab hai maut ka

ruswa kar gayi hai aadmi ko insaaniyat
ruswa kar gaya aadmi bhi aapni niyat
kya baccha hai duniya mein
woh jo kabhi likhte the inquilab zindabad
aaj woh bhi jaala chuke hai.



NICE POETRY

Lost & found

I wake up, I go to my office. I look out.
I see people,
suited up people with PDAs,
happy people, same people, people with one point agenda "INCREMENT//BONUS"...
same happy people..same happiness everyday

same question pops up everyday..

what the fuck is the matter with these fuckin' scumbags.
what the fuck are they fuckin' happy about.
what the fuck are they satisfied with.
job.salary.cellphone.woman.weather.
living.standard.goverment.family.country
where the fuck they want to go?
US.Europe.
where the fuck have they arrived in past 24 hrs or 24 years.

It's weird !
riding on a random bus.
headin' to a destination X.
24..30..50 years

Hindu

Hinduism with its 5000 years old roots in Bharat (India) is one the oldest civilizations existing in the world. This civilization once was spread across all over Indian sub-continent till Gandhar in west, which is now known as Afghanistan to Indonesia and Cambodia in east. Hinduism is a religion, which is constantly evolving. Vedas were one of the earliest works or scriptures which formed the base of Hinduism, but Hinduism did not just stay with Vedas, it moved on with time and became one of the most tolerant religion.

Turning back into history shows that the victory in the battle over Rajputs by Mohammad Ghazni about 1000 A.D., marked the beginning of Muslim invasions into the Indian subcontinent and continued until the next 700 years. The last notable invasion of the Muslims from outside was the invasion of Nadir Shah in 1739, during which he unleashed a great horror on the native Hindu population. During these 700 years of Invasion every Muslim ruler raised towers of Hindu skulls with huge massacres and many others were forcibly converted into Islam. Still many Hindus either faced the death or preferred to be a Hindu and lived in poverty. Some recent studies suggest at least 100 million Hindus were massacred from the period 1000 AD and 1525 AD alone. In 17^th century the British East India Company entered into India on the pretext of trade and slowly from then on the British rule started for the next 200 years. During these two hundred years many missionaries were invited to India and millions of the tribal Hindus were forced to convert into Christianity by force or money.

While the rest of the world was undergoing a tremendous religious transformation during this period, the Hindus in India were able to stand against that storm, and during a thousand years of rule Muslims and Christians were able to make only a small dent in fortress of Hinduism. The early revival of Hinduism in first half of this millennium was to a great extent brought about by people like Adi Shankaracharya and Ramanuja. Renaissance period for Hinduism coincided with the Muslim and British rule. While warriors like Sivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh Fought against Muslim rulers other great people like Mera Bai, Sant Tuka Ram, Chaitanya Maha Prabhu, Ramakrishna Paramhans, Guru Nanak, Swami Vivekananda to name a few, brought about Hinduism renaissance during the Muslim and British Rule.

With this brief background of Indian history and Hinduism let us see what some so-called leaders in modern India say about those people who espouse the cause of Hinduism and India. The Congress Chief Minister of Kerala A.K. Antony on July 14th 2002 in a statement branded R.S.S (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) as a terrorist organization. While another Congress Chief Minister Digvijay Singh of Madhya Pradesh said on 7^th September 2003 that RSS incites violence and communal feelings. What makes these people call RSS a terrorist and communal organization?

What is RSS and what are its Origins?

Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar (1889-1940) founded the ‘Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’ (RSS) on 27th September 1925. It rebounds to the foresight of Dr. Hedgewar that he anticipated the need for strengthening the foundations of the Hindu society and for preparing it for challenges on social, economic, cultural, religious, philosophical and political planes. The thought of selfless people who will volunteer on their own to serve the country, which can never be achieved being a part of political party has led to the foundation of RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh). Dr. Hedgewar has studied medicine in Calcutta; the land of patriotic and revolutionaries came back to Nagpur in 1916. Dr. Hedgewar himself is a patriot himself from childhood, when he refused to eat the sweets distributed marking the golden jubilee of Queen of England's coronation and when he got banned from school for echoing and re-echoing Vande Mataram. Hedgewar even refused to marry and kept his family poverty aside and worked for the cause of the countries freedom until his death in 1940.

Many young and old came forward to be part of this organization for various years and today RSS has over more than 25,000 centers allover India. RSS worked to its strength and did some dedicated works. If one has to look internally the aim of RSS, it is to bring the dharma concept and spirituality into the society and work for the well being of the nation.

The quality of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh comes to fore during times of natural or man-made disasters. When there were earth quakes in Assam, Gujarat, Latur, Uttarakshi, or in Surat, when the Costal Andhra, Bihar, Bengal or Orissa hit with cyclone, or when there is famine in Karnataka, Orissa, Bihar, Gujarat or Rajasthan, it is common to hear from various sources that the Swayamsevaks will be there at every national calamity providing services and relief for the victims. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that after the disastrous cyclone of December 1977 in Andhra pradesh, the Swayamsevaks took care of rehabilitation of the whole Avanigadda village and the then Survodaya leader of Andhra said "The name R.S.S stand for Ready for Selfless Service without discrimination.

In 1965, during the war with Pakistan or during Bangladesh Liberation war, in 1971, or the latest Kargil war, media was full of reports of the role played by Swayamsevaks by providing moral support and relief in the post war period by providing blood donations and establishing nursing camps at war sights for the treatment of wounded soldiers. During the partition of the country in 1947, when several millions of Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims were stranded in Western Pakistan, Swayemsevaks of the same RSS sacrificed their lives to bring back those hapless people into a safe place, by showing limitless valor, sacrifice and martyrdom. Does these qualities make it a terrorist and communal organization?

What makes one or an organization terrorist?

American Heritage Dictionary: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

Does the Rhastriya Swayamsevak Sangh have any of these qualities in its work to make it a terrorist organization? R.S.S works against the perverted beliefs in the name of religion such as untouchability and casteism. Sri Balasaheb Deoras declared "If untouchability is not wrong, there cannot be anything wrong in this world." R.S.S never showed any discrimination in its works and also conducted several programs to eradicate such practices. Thousands of Swayamsevaks invite people from the slums to their houses to participate in the pujas during the festivals and go to their slums and share the fun and happiness of the festivals. R.S.S also established schools at the village level for the purpose of education of below poverty people and hospitals in rural areas, where the governments failed to provide the least medical facilities.

Does these types of works make R.S.S a terrorist organization?

It is really pity and sad to see and hear that the so-called secular forces term such type of organizations as terrorist organizations. These days the communists and the so-called secular fronts made it a habit to call every Hindu organization as a terrorist organization.

These secular and communist forces have forgotten that when the Machu reservoir embankments breached, thousands of people became homeless and most of them were Muslims in it. The Swayamsevaks took care to organize food and relief to the victims and not to forget this calamity happened during Ramadan and Swayamsevaks took every care in the food keeping in mind the Roza norms and made every effort to provide prayer facilities for the victims and not to forget the Gujarat earthquake where several Muslims and Hindus became homeless. R.S.S again worked for relief without any discrimination. Does this quality of Rashtriya Swayamsevaks make it a communal organization?

Can these psuedo secular forces and the communists name any other organization, which works solely for the purpose of nation outside their religion? Has these communists and secular forces did anything for the nation?

Is this terrorism and communalism? I would rather follow such a ‘terrorist’ organization rather than those good for nothing politicians who spread the venom of casteism and religious division.

If trying to make India a progressive and educated country is terrorism then these politicians should quickly seek a psychiatric help. These people lack the credentials to be a critic of an organization as great as Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

Christian missionaries continue to convert many poor Hindus by promising to give them money in Kerala and several evidences were found to prove it, but A.K. Antony never responded to that and he didn't even have a second thoughts before calling Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh a terrorist organization. A.K. Antony and Digvijay Singh proved that they are one of the thousands of dim wit politician who speak without knowing a fact.

I proud to be a Hindu and Indian and I always cherish myself to be born in that great civilization.

Swami Vivekanand Ji on idol worship

Here is an incident I found out while I was going through Swami Vivekanand Ji's bharat yatra.

During his "Bharat bhraman" Swami Ji reached Alwar, where he became acquainted with Maharaja Mangal Singh and on his request visited his palace. Initially the Prince had no faith in the Swami.
Here is a piece of conversation (debate) they had one night.

Swamiji, I have no faith in idol worship, said the Maharaja.

Swamiji replied, "An idol is only a symbol. It is not something to sneer at. Every devotee has his own way of realizing God. It depends on the individual's devotion."

*The Prince was not satisfied with Swamiji's explanation. There was a portrait of the Maharaja on the wall.*

The Swamiji asked the Diwan (chief minister) by his side, 'Whose picture is that?"

"The Maharaja's," replied the Diwan.

Vivekananda said, "Spit on it."

*The Diwan was taken aback. *

"Why are you unhappy?" asked the Swamiji.

* The Diwan thought this man was certainly mad.*

Swamiji explained: "After all, the photograph is just a shadow of your Maharaja. It is devoid of flesh and blood."

"But then it reminds us of the Maharaja, does it not?" said the Diwan.

The Maharaja then apologised to the Swamiji.

Fancy "-ism"(s)

These are the high sounding linguistic acrobatics, only to hoodwink the gullible Hindus, then gradually hustle them into dis-belief and non-belief...then the ground i.e. their minds are vacant for indoctrination with different forms of anti-nationalism, for nefarious interests to be rigorously pursued by such hostile elements.

The first linguistically acrobatic talent-term is SECULARISM. It demands everyone to be faithless which is next to IMPOSSIBLE in a country based and united by faith for the last thousands of years, notwithstanding the political freedom attained in 1947. It is only the majority community that is expected to be secular and not others. Muslims/Christians are expected to be loyal to their faiths within the ambit of secularism. The bogey of secularism benefits the CHINESE-INDIANS i.e. Indian communists most who are pathologically loyal to China/Cuba. These Chinese-Indians worship their GOD who happens to be Karl Marx, follow all rituals of worshipping LORD KARL MARX while preaching Hindus to be secular. These duplicitous traitors cum rogues have no courage in their spines to go to the Swat Valley and preach secularism to the Talibanese. Why should they not be declared so, then arrested under the NSA and dumped in the Andamans, only to rot to death ??? Why should foul-mouthed Naxalites like Prakash & Brinda Karats be allowed to speak against the country and it's cultural heritage ??? Irony of this country is that even rabidly communal muslim groups scream secularism to Hindus !!! INDIRA GANDHI DID THE GREATEST DIS-SERVICE TO THE NATION BY INTRODUCING THE TERM OF SECULARISM INTO THE CONSTITUTION. Negating cultural heritage of a country is a crime worse than sedition. History of this country shall never pardon her for that seditious crime. She too, was anti-national at that moment of our history. When even animals cannot remain faithless, Nehru-Gandhi Congress taught secularism to Indians !!! This moronic secularism, a crude copy of the age-old British concept had been at the root of subversion of our Constitution on so many occasions, in cahoots with the Congress leaders and their foreign masters.

Second linguistically acrobatic genius is MINORITYISM. It a natural and inevitable outcome of the bogey of Secularism. In the name of Minorityism, secular cum anti-nationals can get away with any anti-national offence. It is interesting to observe that their absurd and outrageous demands have absolutely no place even in those countries where they are in majority. Not only Sikhs and Jains, but also monks of the Ramakrshna Mission too, want to classified as 'Minors'.

Another linguistically acrobatic talent-term is PLURALISM. It is true that people of different races have been coming into this country all along, they have been welcomed with open arms and gladly allowed to practise their faiths, so long as it did not become a nuisance/hindrance for the Hindus. They were expected to merge themselves into the concept of Bharatvarsha. Paarsis did it very well by becoming sugar to milk. While Muslims were diametrically opposite, Christians parked themselves somewhere between the two. The masters and champions of the 'DIVIDE & RULE POLICY' incited these communities to assert themselves fanatically so as to undermine the basic ethos of this nation and subvert altogether, in due course of time. To camouflage their nefarious intentions, they coined the term PLURALISM and unilaterally declared our society as a PLURALISTIC SOCIETY. This Pluralism is nothing but divisive anti-nationalism, doing it's best to create more and more satellite centres of gravity away from the real centre of gravity that is Hinduism, under whose ambit all other faiths would have enriched themselves. Champions of Pluralism know very well that no satellite centre of gravity i.e. faith can hold all other faiths together, leave alone the main one, Hinduism. All out destruction of the Hindu society is the aim that they wish to achieve through the lunacy of Pluralism.

When Pluralism is established, how can 'Unity in Diversity' be far behind ??? This is the next linguistically acrobatic talent-term coined by the ENEMIES OF THE NATION. Then, frequent warnings that 'unity of the country shall be jeopardized if diversity is not allowed to have a free run' !!! This diversity is nothing but divisive separatism that is perceptible even to a novice. This tomfoolery was conceptualised by Nehru himself, declared by his Congress (I)TALIAN as the greatest visionary, greater than even the Adi Shankaracharya !!!

Concept of a homogeneous society, centred around it's cultural roots with ample freedom for all, would have given rise to DIVERSITY IN UNITY wherein unity of all would be the final port of call. It would have stamped out the divisive, fissiparous tendencies of the society, nourished by the likes of Karats, Yechurys, Setalwads or Patekars.

NATION DEMANDS ROBUST & ASSERTIVE NATIONALISM. IT IS INEVITABLE & URGENT.

There shall be several more such terms to befool the gullible, innocent Indians. We shall then, visit them to rip them apart in the interest of this great nation.