Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Hindu

Hinduism with its 5000 years old roots in Bharat (India) is one the oldest civilizations existing in the world. This civilization once was spread across all over Indian sub-continent till Gandhar in west, which is now known as Afghanistan to Indonesia and Cambodia in east. Hinduism is a religion, which is constantly evolving. Vedas were one of the earliest works or scriptures which formed the base of Hinduism, but Hinduism did not just stay with Vedas, it moved on with time and became one of the most tolerant religion.

Turning back into history shows that the victory in the battle over Rajputs by Mohammad Ghazni about 1000 A.D., marked the beginning of Muslim invasions into the Indian subcontinent and continued until the next 700 years. The last notable invasion of the Muslims from outside was the invasion of Nadir Shah in 1739, during which he unleashed a great horror on the native Hindu population. During these 700 years of Invasion every Muslim ruler raised towers of Hindu skulls with huge massacres and many others were forcibly converted into Islam. Still many Hindus either faced the death or preferred to be a Hindu and lived in poverty. Some recent studies suggest at least 100 million Hindus were massacred from the period 1000 AD and 1525 AD alone. In 17th century the British East India Company entered into India on the pretext of trade and slowly from then on the British rule started for the next 200 years. During these two hundred years many missionaries were invited to India and millions of the tribal Hindus were forced to convert into Christianity by force or money.

While the rest of the world was undergoing a tremendous religious transformation during this period, the Hindus in India were able to stand against that storm, and during a thousand years of rule Muslims and Christians were able to make only a small dent in fortress of Hinduism. The early revival of Hinduism in first half of this millennium was to a great extent brought about by people like Adi Shankaracharya and Ramanuja. Renaissance period for Hinduism coincided with the Muslim and British rule. While warriors like Sivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh Fought against Muslim rulers other great people like Mera Bai, Sant Tuka Ram, Chaitanya Maha Prabhu, Ramakrishna Paramhans, Guru Nanak, Swami Vivekananda to name a few, brought about Hinduism renaissance during the Muslim and British Rule.

With this brief background of Indian history and Hinduism let us see what some so-called leaders in modern India say about those people who espouse the cause of Hinduism and India. The Congress Chief Minister of Kerala A.K. Antony on July 14th 2002 in a statement branded R.S.S (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) as a terrorist organization. While another Congress Chief Minister Digvijay Singh of Madhya Pradesh said on 7th September 2003 that RSS incites violence and communal feelings. What makes these people call RSS a terrorist and communal organization?

What is RSS and what are its Origins?

Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar (1889-1940) founded the ‘Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’ (RSS) on 27th September 1925. It rebounds to the foresight of Dr. Hedgewar that he anticipated the need for strengthening the foundations of the Hindu society and for preparing it for challenges on social, economic, cultural, religious, philosophical and political planes. The thought of selfless people who will volunteer on their own to serve the country, which can never be achieved being a part of political party has led to the foundation of RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh). Dr. Hedgewar has studied medicine in Calcutta; the land of patriotic and revolutionaries came back to Nagpur in 1916. Dr. Hedgewar himself is a patriot himself from childhood, when he refused to eat the sweets distributed marking the golden jubilee of Queen of England's coronation and when he got banned from school for echoing and re-echoing Vande Mataram. Hedgewar even refused to marry and kept his family poverty aside and worked for the cause of the countries freedom until his death in 1940.

Many young and old came forward to be part of this organization for various years and today RSS has over more than 25,000 centers allover India. RSS worked to its strength and did some dedicated works. If one has to look internally the aim of RSS, it is to bring the dharma concept and spirituality into the society and work for the well being of the nation.

The quality of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh comes to fore during times of natural or man-made disasters. When there were earth quakes in Assam, Gujarat, Latur, Uttarakshi, or in Surat, when the Costal Andhra, Bihar, Bengal or Orissa hit with cyclone, or when there is famine in Karnataka, Orissa, Bihar, Gujarat or Rajasthan, it is common to hear from various sources that the Swayamsevaks will be there at every national calamity providing services and relief for the victims. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that after the disastrous cyclone of December 1977 in Andhra pradesh, the Swayamsevaks took care of rehabilitation of the whole Avanigadda village and the then Survodaya leader of Andhra said "The name R.S.S stand for Ready for Selfless Service without discrimination.

In 1965, during the war with Pakistan or during Bangladesh Liberation war, in 1971, or the latest Kargil war, media was full of reports of the role played by Swayamsevaks by providing moral support and relief in the post war period by providing blood donations and establishing nursing camps at war sights for the treatment of wounded soldiers. During the partition of the country in 1947, when several millions of Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims were stranded in Western Pakistan, Swayemsevaks of the same RSS sacrificed their lives to bring back those hapless people into a safe place, by showing limitless valor, sacrifice and martyrdom. Does these qualities make it a terrorist and communal organization?

What makes one or an organization terrorist?

American Heritage Dictionary: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

Does the Rhastriya Swayamsevak Sangh have any of these qualities in its work to make it a terrorist organization? R.S.S works against the perverted beliefs in the name of religion such as untouchability and casteism. Sri Balasaheb Deoras declared "If untouchability is not wrong, there cannot be anything wrong in this world." R.S.S never showed any discrimination in its works and also conducted several programs to eradicate such practices. Thousands of Swayamsevaks invite people from the slums to their houses to participate in the pujas during the festivals and go to their slums and share the fun and happiness of the festivals. R.S.S also established schools at the village level for the purpose of education of below poverty people and hospitals in rural areas, where the governments failed to provide the least medical facilities.

Does these types of works make R.S.S a terrorist organization?

It is really pity and sad to see and hear that the so-called secular forces term such type of organizations as terrorist organizations. These days the communists and the so-called secular fronts made it a habit to call every Hindu organization as a terrorist organization.

These secular and communist forces have forgotten that when the Machu reservoir embankments breached, thousands of people became homeless and most of them were Muslims in it. The Swayamsevaks took care to organize food and relief to the victims and not to forget this calamity happened during Ramadan and Swayamsevaks took every care in the food keeping in mind the Roza norms and made every effort to provide prayer facilities for the victims and not to forget the Gujarat earthquake where several Muslims and Hindus became homeless. R.S.S again worked for relief without any discrimination. Does this quality of Rashtriya Swayamsevaks make it a communal organization?

Can these psuedo secular forces and the communists name any other organization, which works solely for the purpose of nation outside their religion? Has these communists and secular forces did anything for the nation?

Is this terrorism and communalism? I would rather follow such a ‘terrorist’ organization rather than those good for nothing politicians who spread the venom of casteism and religious division.

If trying to make India a progressive and educated country is terrorism then these politicians should quickly seek a psychiatric help. These people lack the credentials to be a critic of an organization as great as Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

Christian missionaries continue to convert many poor Hindus by promising to give them money in Kerala and several evidences were found to prove it, but A.K. Antony never responded to that and he didn't even have a second thoughts before calling Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh a terrorist organization. A.K. Antony and Digvijay Singh proved that they are one of the thousands of dim wit politician who speak without knowing a fact.

I proud to be a Hindu and Indian and I always cherish myself to be born in that great civilization.

Swami Vivekanand Ji on idol worship

Here is an incident I found out while I was going through Swami Vivekanand Ji's bharat yatra.

During his "Bharat bhraman" Swami Ji reached Alwar, where he became acquainted with Maharaja Mangal Singh and on his request visited his palace. Initially the Prince had no faith in the Swami.

Here is a piece of conversation (debate) they had one night.

Swamiji, I have no faith in idol worship, said the Maharaja.

Swamiji replied, "An idol is only a symbol. It is not something to sneer at. Every devotee has his own way of realizing God. It depends on the individual's devotion."

*The Prince was not satisfied with Swamiji's explanation. There was a portrait of the Maharaja on the wall.*

The Swamiji asked the Diwan (chief minister) by his side, 'Whose picture is that?"

"The Maharaja's," replied the Diwan.

Vivekananda said, "Spit on it."

*The Diwan was taken aback. *

"Why are you unhappy?" asked the Swamiji.

* The Diwan thought this man was certainly mad.*

Swamiji explained: "After all, the photograph is just a shadow of your Maharaja. It is devoid of flesh and blood."

"But then it reminds us of the Maharaja, does it not?" said the Diwan.

The Maharaja then apologised to the Swamiji.

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Fancy "-ism"(s)

These are the high sounding linguistic acrobatics, only to hoodwink the gullible Hindus, then gradually hustle them into dis-belief and non-belief...then the ground i.e. their minds are vacant for indoctrination with different forms of anti-nationalism, for nefarious interests to be rigorously pursued by such hostile elements.

The first linguistically acrobatic talent-term is SECULARISM. It demands everyone to be faithless which is next to IMPOSSIBLE in a country based and united by faith for the last thousands of years, notwithstanding the political freedom attained in 1947. It is only the majority community that is expected to be secular and not others. Muslims/Christians are expected to be loyal to their faiths within the ambit of secularism. The bogey of secularism benefits the CHINESE-INDIANS i.e. Indian communists most who are pathologically loyal to China/Cuba. These Chinese-Indians worship their GOD who happens to be Karl Marx, follow all rituals of worshipping LORD KARL MARX while preaching Hindus to be secular. These duplicitous traitors cum rogues have no courage in their spines to go to the Swat Valley and preach secularism to the Talibanese. Why should they not be declared so, then arrested under the NSA and dumped in the Andamans, only to rot to death ??? Why should foul-mouthed Naxalites like Prakash & Brinda Karats be allowed to speak against the country and it's cultural heritage ??? Irony of this country is that even rabidly communal muslim groups scream secularism to Hindus !!! INDIRA GANDHI DID THE GREATEST DIS-SERVICE TO THE NATION BY INTRODUCING THE TERM OF SECULARISM INTO THE CONSTITUTION. Negating cultural heritage of a country is a crime worse than sedition. History of this country shall never pardon her for that seditious crime. She too, was anti-national at that moment of our history. When even animals cannot remain faithless, Nehru-Gandhi Congress taught secularism to Indians !!! This moronic secularism, a crude copy of the age-old British concept had been at the root of subversion of our Constitution on so many occasions, in cahoots with the Congress leaders and their foreign masters.

Second linguistically acrobatic genius is MINORITYISM. It a natural and inevitable outcome of the bogey of Secularism. In the name of Minorityism, secular cum anti-nationals can get away with any anti-national offence. It is interesting to observe that their absurd and outrageous demands have absolutely no place even in those countries where they are in majority. Not only Sikhs and Jains, but also monks of the Ramakrshna Mission too, want to classified as 'Minors'.

Another linguistically acrobatic talent-term is PLURALISM. It is true that people of different races have been coming into this country all along, they have been welcomed with open arms and gladly allowed to practise their faiths, so long as it did not become a nuisance/hindrance for the Hindus. They were expected to merge themselves into the concept of Bharatvarsha. Paarsis did it very well by becoming sugar to milk. While Muslims were diametrically opposite, Christians parked themselves somewhere between the two. The masters and champions of the 'DIVIDE & RULE POLICY' incited these communities to assert themselves fanatically so as to undermine the basic ethos of this nation and subvert altogether, in due course of time. To camouflage their nefarious intentions, they coined the term PLURALISM and unilaterally declared our society as a PLURALISTIC SOCIETY. This Pluralism is nothing but divisive anti-nationalism, doing it's best to create more and more satellite centres of gravity away from the real centre of gravity that is Hinduism, under whose ambit all other faiths would have enriched themselves. Champions of Pluralism know very well that no satellite centre of gravity i.e. faith can hold all other faiths together, leave alone the main one, Hinduism. All out destruction of the Hindu society is the aim that they wish to achieve through the lunacy of Pluralism.

When Pluralism is established, how can 'Unity in Diversity' be far behind ??? This is the next linguistically acrobatic talent-term coined by the ENEMIES OF THE NATION. Then, frequent warnings that 'unity of the country shall be jeopardized if diversity is not allowed to have a free run' !!! This diversity is nothing but divisive separatism that is perceptible even to a novice. This tomfoolery was conceptualised by Nehru himself, declared by his Congress (I)TALIAN as the greatest visionary, greater than even the Adi Shankaracharya !!!

Concept of a homogeneous society, centred around it's cultural roots with ample freedom for all, would have given rise to DIVERSITY IN UNITY wherein unity of all would be the final port of call. It would have stamped out the divisive, fissiparous tendencies of the society, nourished by the likes of Karats, Yechurys, Setalwads or Patekars.

NATION DEMANDS ROBUST & ASSERTIVE NATIONALISM. IT IS INEVITABLE & URGENT.

There shall be several more such terms to befool the gullible, innocent Indians. We shall then, visit them to rip them apart in the interest of this great nation.

Friday, June 12, 2009

अतीत के दर्पण में आपातकाल

June of 1975,

The Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad found the sitting Prime Minister Mrs. Gandhi guilty of election fraud, and ordered her to be removed from her seat in Lower house of the Parliament (lok sabha) and banned from running for an additional six years.


Mid-night of June 25th,
Black night for Indian democracy
.

Mrs. Gandhi in turn, recommended President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed to issue "extraordinary laws" that bypassed parliament altogether, allowing her to rule by decree. She declared a State of Emergency, and in her own words brought democracy "to a grinding halt". Invoking article 352 of the Indian Constitution, she granted herself extraordinary powers and launched a massive crackdown on civil liberties and political opposition.

Right after that black night , Lok nayak Jayprakash Narayan called for the PM's resignation and asked the military and the police to disregard unconstitutional and immoral orders; Jayaprakash Narayan attracted a gathering of 100,000 people at the Ramlila Grounds , Delhi and thunderously recited these lines of Rashtrakavi Ramdhari Singh 'Dinkar''s.


"सिंहासन खाली करो कि जनता आती है।"

सदियों की ठंढी-बुझी राख सुगबुगा उठी,
मिट्टी सोने का ताज पहन इठलाती है;
दो राह,समय के रथ का घर्घर-नाद सुनो,
सिंहासन खाली करो कि जनता आती है।

जनता?हां,मिट्टी की अबोध मूरतें वही,
जाडे-पाले की कसक सदा सहनेवाली,
जब अंग-अंग में लगे सांप हो चुस रहे
तब भी न कभी मुंह खोल दर्द कहनेवाली।
जनता?हां,लंबी - बडी जीभ की वही कसम,
"जनता,सचमुच ही, बडी वेदना सहती है।"
"सो ठीक,मगर,आखिर,इस पर जनमत क्या है?"
'है प्रश्न गूढ़ जनता इस पर क्या कहती है?"
मानो,जनता ही फूल जिसे अहसास नहीं,
जब चाहो तभी उतार सजा लो दोनों में;
अथवा कोई दूधमुंही जिसे बहलाने के
जन्तर-मन्तर सीमित हों चार खिलौनों में।
लेकिन होता भूडोल, बवंडर उठते हैं,
जनता जब कोपाकुल हो भृकुटि चढाती है;
दो राह, समय के रथ का घर्घर-नाद सुनो,
सिंहासन खाली करो कि जनता आती है।

हुंकारों से महलों की नींव उखड़ जाती,
सांसों के बल से ताज हवा में उड़ता है,
जनता की रोके राह,समय में ताव कहां?
वह जिधर चाहती,काल उधर ही मुड़ता है।
अब्दों,शताब्दियों,सहस्त्राब्द का अंधकार
बीता;गवाक्ष अंबर के दहके जाते हैं;
यह और नहीं कोई,जनता के स्वप्न अजय
चीरते तिमिर का वक्ष उमड़ते जाते हैं।
सब से विराट जनतंत्र जगत का आ पहुंचा,
तैंतीस कोटि-हित सिंहासन तय करो
अभिषेक आज राजा का नहीं,प्रजा का है,
तैंतीस कोटि जनता के सिर पर मुकुट धरो।
आरती लिये तू किसे ढूंढता है मूरख,
मन्दिरों, राजप्रासादों में, तहखानों में?
देवता कहीं सड़कों पर गिट्टी तोड़ रहे,
देवता मिलेंगे खेतों में, खलिहानों में।
फावड़े और हल राजदण्ड बनने को हैं,
धूसरता सोने से श्रृंगार सजाती है;
दो राह,समय के रथ का घर्घर-नाद सुनो,
सिंहासन खाली करो कि जनता आती है।