Few lines from a conversation between
two great patriots
two great pundit of politics
two great philosophers
of Nanda's era
महामात्य कात्तायण: आज मैंने देख लिया आर्य! सच की परिभाषा व्यक्ति के साथ बदल जाती है | जिनकी भुजाओं में शक्ति होती है , उनकी मुट्ठी में सच होता है |
महामन्त्री षत्ताअर: जब यह जानते हो तो फिर क्यों व्यथित हो रहे हो अमात्य | यही दर्शन है और यही राजनीति भी |
Friday, August 14, 2009
Monday, August 3, 2009
Why this and why not that
Many people in our country hold the view that any venture that we undertake should be based on a grand world-thought capable of rendering good to the whole of humanity eschewing all narrow limitations of the country, community or religion. In support of this view, some proclaim that in this age of missiles and rockets distance has vanished, boundaries of countries have become meaningless and the whole world has shrunk. They, therefore, feel that the very concept of country, nation, etc., has become outdated, that the spirit of world unity alone should inspire all our activities. They conclude that the modern ‘isms’ which have taken up ‘internationalism’ as their watchword can alone lead us to that cherished goal.
Now, the question that naturally poses itself before us is how far is the task of reorganising the national life of Hindus taken by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, in conformity with the spirit of world unity and human good?
At the very outset, let it be made clear that it is not the modern thinkers who are the first in the field to think in terms of world unity and universal welfare. Long long ago, in fact, long before the so-called modern age had set in, the seers and savants of this land had delved deep into this vital question. The ideal of human unity, of a world free from all traces of conflict and misery, has stirred our hearts since times immemorial. Our one constant prayer all through the ages has been Let everyone be happy, let everyone be free from all ills While the present-day West has not been able to go beyond the motto of ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’, we have never tolerated the idea of a single human being – why, of even a single living organism – being miserable. ‘Total good of all beings’ has always been our glorious ideal.
But coming to the plane of the present-day world, we are faced with the hard reality of the all-round discord and disruption ravaging human society. Today, humanity is divided and subdivided into so many small exclusive groups called nations or states, each one of them devoted to its own narrow self-interest. And it is a matter of common experience that wherever there are groups inspired only by self-interest, there is bound to be mutual conflict. Obviously, human unity and welfare is impossible so long as this type of conflict continues. The present state of strifes and wars resulting in human destruction and misery has led many thinkers to conclude that the sentiment of nationalism which nourishes exclusive self-interest is the major obstacle in the way of world unity and human welfare. They, therefore, declare that nationalism should be rooted out from the minds of men all over the world. The Communist ideology which claims internationalism as its sheet-anchor often talks in this strain.
On the other hand, there is another school of thought, which holds that the roots of nationalism are so deep and long-standing that it is impossible to destroy them. Soviet Russia, which sought to discard nationalism in a bid to take to international communism soon learnt by experience that destruction of this sentiment deprives the people of the incentive for dedicated effort. In the first flush of revolution, material progress was no doubt achieved in Russia in a certain measure. Their first few Seven Year Plans were to an extent successful. But, by and by, the enthusiasm of the people began to wane, their incentive for work began to die away. Eventually, labour in big factories had to be forced to work at the point of bayonet. And again during the Second World War, when Hitler’s tanks were relentlessly pressing forward on the Russian soil, the slogan of ‘Internationalism’ and ‘Communism’ failed to enthuse the Russian people. This served as an eye-opener to the Russian leaders who found it absolutely essential to rouse the dormant patriotic sentiments of the Russian people by invoking their age-old loyalty to motherland and their heroic ancestors. It is evident, therefore, that it is devotion to one’s motherland, society and tradition experienced under the concept of nation that inspires the spirit of real service and sacrifice in the individual.
We can thus conclude that nationalism cannot and should not be destroyed. Then the problem boils down to one of achieving a synthesis of national aspirations and world welfare. Synthesis of various kinds have been, in fact, attempted from time to time in the past. Imperialism has sometimes been claimed to be one such large-scale effort to eliminate conflicts between smaller nations by making them limbs of a single empire. But as it was basically motivated by self-aggrandizement, leading to revolts by the subject nations against their oppression and exploitation, imperialism failed to eliminate international conflicts.
The League of Nations, formed after the First World War, was also an experiment in avoiding wars and achieving world unity. But within just two decades of its birth, the League of Nations was shattered to pieces on the rock of unbridled national ambitions and consequent conflicts. A more terrible war than all the previous ones besmirched the face of the earth with death and destruction. The UNO too, formed after the Second World War, is faring no better. Our own experience in the case of Kashmir issue tells us that it is incapable of meting out justice, of pulling up the erring members and bringing about an honourable amity among nations. It has been converted into an arena for international conflicts, the powerful nations trying to dominate its forum to further their expansionistic ends. The world is overcast with the dark clouds of a third world war which may, at any time, mean the sudden and total end of the present civilisation itself.
We thus see that nations are not prepared to come together in a spirit of amity for the welfare of mankind. On the contrary, the national entities are getting more and more exclusive and their ambitions whetted day by day. Newer nations are also coming up on the world stage. The entire face of the world is covered with conflicts between nations.
In short, nationalism cannot be destroyed; all attempts to harmonise the national ambitions so far have also utterly failed; and the world is on the brink of a nuclear holocaust. Then, which way lies the salvation for humanity? No answer to this challenge seems to be forthcoming. Thinkers, the world over, are on the horns of a dilemma.
Now, the question that naturally poses itself before us is how far is the task of reorganising the national life of Hindus taken by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, in conformity with the spirit of world unity and human good?
At the very outset, let it be made clear that it is not the modern thinkers who are the first in the field to think in terms of world unity and universal welfare. Long long ago, in fact, long before the so-called modern age had set in, the seers and savants of this land had delved deep into this vital question. The ideal of human unity, of a world free from all traces of conflict and misery, has stirred our hearts since times immemorial. Our one constant prayer all through the ages has been Let everyone be happy, let everyone be free from all ills While the present-day West has not been able to go beyond the motto of ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’, we have never tolerated the idea of a single human being – why, of even a single living organism – being miserable. ‘Total good of all beings’ has always been our glorious ideal.
But coming to the plane of the present-day world, we are faced with the hard reality of the all-round discord and disruption ravaging human society. Today, humanity is divided and subdivided into so many small exclusive groups called nations or states, each one of them devoted to its own narrow self-interest. And it is a matter of common experience that wherever there are groups inspired only by self-interest, there is bound to be mutual conflict. Obviously, human unity and welfare is impossible so long as this type of conflict continues. The present state of strifes and wars resulting in human destruction and misery has led many thinkers to conclude that the sentiment of nationalism which nourishes exclusive self-interest is the major obstacle in the way of world unity and human welfare. They, therefore, declare that nationalism should be rooted out from the minds of men all over the world. The Communist ideology which claims internationalism as its sheet-anchor often talks in this strain.
On the other hand, there is another school of thought, which holds that the roots of nationalism are so deep and long-standing that it is impossible to destroy them. Soviet Russia, which sought to discard nationalism in a bid to take to international communism soon learnt by experience that destruction of this sentiment deprives the people of the incentive for dedicated effort. In the first flush of revolution, material progress was no doubt achieved in Russia in a certain measure. Their first few Seven Year Plans were to an extent successful. But, by and by, the enthusiasm of the people began to wane, their incentive for work began to die away. Eventually, labour in big factories had to be forced to work at the point of bayonet. And again during the Second World War, when Hitler’s tanks were relentlessly pressing forward on the Russian soil, the slogan of ‘Internationalism’ and ‘Communism’ failed to enthuse the Russian people. This served as an eye-opener to the Russian leaders who found it absolutely essential to rouse the dormant patriotic sentiments of the Russian people by invoking their age-old loyalty to motherland and their heroic ancestors. It is evident, therefore, that it is devotion to one’s motherland, society and tradition experienced under the concept of nation that inspires the spirit of real service and sacrifice in the individual.
We can thus conclude that nationalism cannot and should not be destroyed. Then the problem boils down to one of achieving a synthesis of national aspirations and world welfare. Synthesis of various kinds have been, in fact, attempted from time to time in the past. Imperialism has sometimes been claimed to be one such large-scale effort to eliminate conflicts between smaller nations by making them limbs of a single empire. But as it was basically motivated by self-aggrandizement, leading to revolts by the subject nations against their oppression and exploitation, imperialism failed to eliminate international conflicts.
The League of Nations, formed after the First World War, was also an experiment in avoiding wars and achieving world unity. But within just two decades of its birth, the League of Nations was shattered to pieces on the rock of unbridled national ambitions and consequent conflicts. A more terrible war than all the previous ones besmirched the face of the earth with death and destruction. The UNO too, formed after the Second World War, is faring no better. Our own experience in the case of Kashmir issue tells us that it is incapable of meting out justice, of pulling up the erring members and bringing about an honourable amity among nations. It has been converted into an arena for international conflicts, the powerful nations trying to dominate its forum to further their expansionistic ends. The world is overcast with the dark clouds of a third world war which may, at any time, mean the sudden and total end of the present civilisation itself.
We thus see that nations are not prepared to come together in a spirit of amity for the welfare of mankind. On the contrary, the national entities are getting more and more exclusive and their ambitions whetted day by day. Newer nations are also coming up on the world stage. The entire face of the world is covered with conflicts between nations.
In short, nationalism cannot be destroyed; all attempts to harmonise the national ambitions so far have also utterly failed; and the world is on the brink of a nuclear holocaust. Then, which way lies the salvation for humanity? No answer to this challenge seems to be forthcoming. Thinkers, the world over, are on the horns of a dilemma.
Saturday, August 1, 2009
MOTHER TERESA
Hehe I didn't quote "fallacious history", I didn't even quote anything from HISTORY in general. Although I know I wrote WEST by mistake instead of EAST but I don't think if it really did change anything and anyways that wasn't an attempt to "MISLEAD" anybody. That Bengal thing i quoted is from "A brief History of MODERN INDIA" by Rajy Ahir a well known book for civil services and rest of the things. I am really glad that you forgave me for writing WEST instead EAST though.
Unfortunately you didn't seem to establish yer mind if you are against religion, patriostism or HINDUTVA or me because the MOTHER TERESA you're talkin' about
was nothing but a MISSIONARY she wasn't no athiest. A garden variety CNN IBN led guy would barely know about Sangh and their motives and definition of Hindutva according to Guru Golwalkar Ji, Sudarshan Ji, Atal Ji or SUPREME COURT. You know about VHP but you don't about Seva Bharati or Shishu mandir.
Anyways let it be, trust me I don't want to change the topic now but you must know RSS is the major force working against CASTEISM, UNTOUCHABILITY. RSS came in picture in 1925 and BJP in 1980 and hindu politics in 1987 after Shah Bano case. Patriotism doesn't mean fighting with Pakistan, it also mean you should stop at the red signal, try to save energy. You'd hate Hindutva but you might like "INTERGRAL HUMANISM" 'cuase it's been supported by ENGLISH people which is nothing but a daughter concept of Hindutva.
Again you keep talkin' about me while am talking about an ideology. You keep calling me middle class, you are the one who's classifying people and questioning me. I tell ya what, I am born and brought up in well to do and politically and socially active people family i never had to and i never wanted go through BOOKS to understand society, I was born and brought among masses. I graduated from the best school in India. Socially active since 8th standard. I have been collecting every single ounce of my ideology for past 22 years. I have a nice job. Wtf does make you think am middle class what gave you that right. Just 'cause I ADVOCATE Indian philosophy instead of western and commercial.
I am 101 % sure you ain't sure and clear with the definition and etymology of स्वतंत्रता and परतंत्रता , you don't know why Bhagat Singh died, why someone like Neta Ji shook hands with Hitler.
you don't need to be patriotic one Swami Ji, one Dr. Hedgewar, one Gandhi , one Patel , one Neta Ji was way to more than enough for Mother Inida.
and tell me
Do you really think I haven't read Gita or MAHABHARAT or RAMAYAN.
Unfortunately you didn't seem to establish yer mind if you are against religion, patriostism or HINDUTVA or me because the MOTHER TERESA you're talkin' about
was nothing but a MISSIONARY she wasn't no athiest. A garden variety CNN IBN led guy would barely know about Sangh and their motives and definition of Hindutva according to Guru Golwalkar Ji, Sudarshan Ji, Atal Ji or SUPREME COURT. You know about VHP but you don't about Seva Bharati or Shishu mandir.
Anyways let it be, trust me I don't want to change the topic now but you must know RSS is the major force working against CASTEISM, UNTOUCHABILITY. RSS came in picture in 1925 and BJP in 1980 and hindu politics in 1987 after Shah Bano case. Patriotism doesn't mean fighting with Pakistan, it also mean you should stop at the red signal, try to save energy. You'd hate Hindutva but you might like "INTERGRAL HUMANISM" 'cuase it's been supported by ENGLISH people which is nothing but a daughter concept of Hindutva.
Again you keep talkin' about me while am talking about an ideology. You keep calling me middle class, you are the one who's classifying people and questioning me. I tell ya what, I am born and brought up in well to do and politically and socially active people family i never had to and i never wanted go through BOOKS to understand society, I was born and brought among masses. I graduated from the best school in India. Socially active since 8th standard. I have been collecting every single ounce of my ideology for past 22 years. I have a nice job. Wtf does make you think am middle class what gave you that right. Just 'cause I ADVOCATE Indian philosophy instead of western and commercial.
I am 101 % sure you ain't sure and clear with the definition and etymology of स्वतंत्रता and परतंत्रता , you don't know why Bhagat Singh died, why someone like Neta Ji shook hands with Hitler.
you don't need to be patriotic one Swami Ji, one Dr. Hedgewar, one Gandhi , one Patel , one Neta Ji was way to more than enough for Mother Inida.
and tell me
Do you really think I haven't read Gita or MAHABHARAT or RAMAYAN.
Friday, July 31, 2009
Deja Vu
Hahaha I know we're having a new crop of fresh graduates from "University of Intellectuals".well neither do the swallowing the scientific results and not intending to think about its great helping hands towards the destruction are gonna fetch us the solutions. With due respect I didn’t exactly count the number of paragraphs or the number of lines, where I asked you to think or so but I am not asking you to think I know its beyond you. People fight over hell lot of issues, you just can't relate it simply to religion. We all know people do die 'cause of religion, but people perhaps a lot more die beacuse of "Bizali ke jhatkey", nuclear bombs, chemical weapons, global warming and hole in ozone layer, what are you gonna do about it? whip chemistry and physics off. I am not against Science, I am myself an elec. engg from IIT. Where there is power, there is abuse of Power and Religion is the most powerful thing.
It depends on the people how they use or deal with it. It's rahter unfortunate people always go for the darker side, they are too blind to see the brighter side. Its quite evident that you too fail to see the depth of religion. You know about Bin Laden but you don't want to talk about Gandhi who controlled all this bloodshed on the west side during partition with Geeta in one hand and Quraan in the other.
You want to buy that cookie 'cause you're born and brought up in a society which talks about humanity, mercy, tolerance which comes from nothing but religion.
It's weird that you relate my comment with any kind of regionalism. I'd not comment on that.
i don't know why you ain't getting it but as far as I think you can't do a tripple inetgration problem just because you want to and you are concerned about it, you gotta have an understanding of Maths and a background in Maths. It's not rocket science and same is the case with society. If you don;t understand and respect their beliefs and values then may be you should.
In all that jugglery of adjectives you did in all those lines, you persistently seem to sing that “you are a fascist” song which is kind of funny, ‘cause as far as I understand, one of the very important feature of FASCISM is anti-conservative nationalism and mine is “conservative nationalism” but I tell ya what, Fascist is more of an epithet of contemporary era. People use it for addressing their political or ideological enemies. In “What is Fascism?”, George Orwell says .
“The word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation,of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else... almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’.”
So this fascist word doesn't mean nothing to me. It's for everybody, it's like you know I am your fasicts and you are my fascist. You questioned my question but eventually you did talk about that communal voilence.
Well I tell you writers who pondered the society and its grievances in their creations and they got respect, but again people who just advocate western ideolgies which don't suit our system. What hell have they done apart from criticising and making fuss about the contemporary system?
and on the last thing which you found funny had a lot of things
1. I don't and didn't bring up the personal relationships, you did.
2. My leaders don't have sons and wives, they are full time nationalists.
3. Like the way you feel for your mother, there are people who do feel the same for Mother India and Maa Sarswati.
4. Like you said "you don't know why your name is Rama, it could have been Spiderman or anything". But it's Rama and you don't know why. That was my whole point.
at the end you still haven't disclosed your ideolgy, your execution plan or anything.
It depends on the people how they use or deal with it. It's rahter unfortunate people always go for the darker side, they are too blind to see the brighter side. Its quite evident that you too fail to see the depth of religion. You know about Bin Laden but you don't want to talk about Gandhi who controlled all this bloodshed on the west side during partition with Geeta in one hand and Quraan in the other.
You want to buy that cookie 'cause you're born and brought up in a society which talks about humanity, mercy, tolerance which comes from nothing but religion.
It's weird that you relate my comment with any kind of regionalism. I'd not comment on that.
i don't know why you ain't getting it but as far as I think you can't do a tripple inetgration problem just because you want to and you are concerned about it, you gotta have an understanding of Maths and a background in Maths. It's not rocket science and same is the case with society. If you don;t understand and respect their beliefs and values then may be you should.
In all that jugglery of adjectives you did in all those lines, you persistently seem to sing that “you are a fascist” song which is kind of funny, ‘cause as far as I understand, one of the very important feature of FASCISM is anti-conservative nationalism and mine is “conservative nationalism” but I tell ya what, Fascist is more of an epithet of contemporary era. People use it for addressing their political or ideological enemies. In “What is Fascism?”, George Orwell says .
“The word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation,of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else... almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’.”
So this fascist word doesn't mean nothing to me. It's for everybody, it's like you know I am your fasicts and you are my fascist. You questioned my question but eventually you did talk about that communal voilence.
Well I tell you writers who pondered the society and its grievances in their creations and they got respect, but again people who just advocate western ideolgies which don't suit our system. What hell have they done apart from criticising and making fuss about the contemporary system?
and on the last thing which you found funny had a lot of things
1. I don't and didn't bring up the personal relationships, you did.
2. My leaders don't have sons and wives, they are full time nationalists.
3. Like the way you feel for your mother, there are people who do feel the same for Mother India and Maa Sarswati.
4. Like you said "you don't know why your name is Rama, it could have been Spiderman or anything". But it's Rama and you don't know why. That was my whole point.
at the end you still haven't disclosed your ideolgy, your execution plan or anything.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
intellectuality ke thekedaar
Questioning religion or an ideology doesn't take more than an ounce from your cask of intellectuality.
you want to question God, you just got to say "why do people worship god when they haven't seen The God"
you want to question religion, you just got to say "look Hindu muslims are fighting over mandir maszid, what's the point"
you want to question reservation, you just got to say "look that guy got 60% in 12th standard and still graduating from a medical college just 'cause he comes from a particular section of society"
you want to question feminism, you just got to say "ohh look Sania Mirza's boobs are popping out"
i want to question SCIENCE i just got to say "i have never seen a fuckin' electron, whole electrical engineering is nothing bull fuckin' society manufactured crap"
(I assume you understand that if you would try to justify it by some theories and mathematical equations based on assumptions like 2*2 is 4 or 60 seconds make a minute then we've Vedas, Upnishad, Quran and Bible, if you'd you can feel an electric shock then there are people who'd say and do say that they can feel mighty God)
If theory of creation is shitolad then i don't see any thing more stupid then a theory which says life started with a fuckin' cell then they became fish and the monkey the fuckin man, it's fuckin' nothing but genuine crap. If Jesus Christ was not intelligent enough then Charles Darwin was also a dickhead.
but talkin' about all this is, writing on your blog about religion and feminism is one thing
and
visiting a village in North India and seeing the status of Brhamin, Thakur and underprivileged class is whole different thing.
go to Sawaimadhaapur and Bundi in Rajsthan you'd look at women's status you'd understand female and feminism
go to Kashi, Mathura, Chitrkoot, Azmer you'd get a less mirky picture of people's faith.
All people are not rich and intellectual enough to go through western thoughts and read Richard Dawkins and Karl Marx and follow Lev Kamenev, here people follow and talk about Swami vivekanand Ji, Gnadhi, Patel, Bose people those who were inspired by Ramayana Shrimad BhagwadGeeta and Vedas.
An ideology, a concept is pure fuckshit if it doesn't suit the people, if it doesn't slip through people's throat.
Communisim आता है , चला जाता है . धर्मं वहीँ रहता है .
It's been here in India since the birth of human race.
Definitely there should be reforms but if you wipe this system off this planet you must come with a new ideolgy, new thoery and of course new plan.
If you don't understand people, their feelings their faith then you shouldn't be worried about them and wasting your time with thinking of religion and shit.Get up,go to your job, come back have your dinner and sleep. People and society are fine with or without you.
If you want to talk about society then you better have a look at it, it's status and it's need.
Reading Franz Kafka and scribbling in attractive English is something majority got nothin' to do with. All this would make you an intellectual, Sobha De, Mahesh Bhatt or yogendra yadav and trust me they don't exist beyond Mumbai, Banglore or Delhi.
and I'd like not to get harsh and wouldn't use unparliamentary language but since you brought my mother into all this (Fuck your motherfucking boyfriend) I'd like to ask you did you tell yer mother about yer views and her stupidity 'cause she named ya Rama? if you didn't yet then may be you should and now since you've gained all the knowledge then you should get it changed. All you need is a Rs. 10 ka affidavit. This "all this is society manufactured" might be cool, may be beneficial for ya at max. but it's not meant and healthy for the whole society. Everything is society manufactured. Everyfuckinthing not just racism or sex discrimination are society manufactured concepts values of human life, mercy, charity, humanity all this is society manufactured. And Gangotri of this Ganga is RELIGION. It takes no great intelligence that RELIGION is also a society manufactured concept but we need things to tame the society and avoid chaos. When you think it's bad to rape a woman , or hurt someone or to kill the inocents. It's the RELIGION. Roots are way to more deeper than what you think. No matter how hard we try we can't think out of the box, we're always inside that box.
Roots of religion are way to more deeper than what you think, that's why yer name is Rama
you want to question God, you just got to say "why do people worship god when they haven't seen The God"
you want to question religion, you just got to say "look Hindu muslims are fighting over mandir maszid, what's the point"
you want to question reservation, you just got to say "look that guy got 60% in 12th standard and still graduating from a medical college just 'cause he comes from a particular section of society"
you want to question feminism, you just got to say "ohh look Sania Mirza's boobs are popping out"
i want to question SCIENCE i just got to say "i have never seen a fuckin' electron, whole electrical engineering is nothing bull fuckin' society manufactured crap"
(I assume you understand that if you would try to justify it by some theories and mathematical equations based on assumptions like 2*2 is 4 or 60 seconds make a minute then we've Vedas, Upnishad, Quran and Bible, if you'd you can feel an electric shock then there are people who'd say and do say that they can feel mighty God)
If theory of creation is shitolad then i don't see any thing more stupid then a theory which says life started with a fuckin' cell then they became fish and the monkey the fuckin man, it's fuckin' nothing but genuine crap. If Jesus Christ was not intelligent enough then Charles Darwin was also a dickhead.
but talkin' about all this is, writing on your blog about religion and feminism is one thing
and
visiting a village in North India and seeing the status of Brhamin, Thakur and underprivileged class is whole different thing.
go to Sawaimadhaapur and Bundi in Rajsthan you'd look at women's status you'd understand female and feminism
go to Kashi, Mathura, Chitrkoot, Azmer you'd get a less mirky picture of people's faith.
All people are not rich and intellectual enough to go through western thoughts and read Richard Dawkins and Karl Marx and follow Lev Kamenev, here people follow and talk about Swami vivekanand Ji, Gnadhi, Patel, Bose people those who were inspired by Ramayana Shrimad BhagwadGeeta and Vedas.
An ideology, a concept is pure fuckshit if it doesn't suit the people, if it doesn't slip through people's throat.
Communisim आता है , चला जाता है . धर्मं वहीँ रहता है .
It's been here in India since the birth of human race.
Definitely there should be reforms but if you wipe this system off this planet you must come with a new ideolgy, new thoery and of course new plan.
If you don't understand people, their feelings their faith then you shouldn't be worried about them and wasting your time with thinking of religion and shit.Get up,go to your job, come back have your dinner and sleep. People and society are fine with or without you.
If you want to talk about society then you better have a look at it, it's status and it's need.
Reading Franz Kafka and scribbling in attractive English is something majority got nothin' to do with. All this would make you an intellectual, Sobha De, Mahesh Bhatt or yogendra yadav and trust me they don't exist beyond Mumbai, Banglore or Delhi.
and I'd like not to get harsh and wouldn't use unparliamentary language but since you brought my mother into all this (Fuck your motherfucking boyfriend) I'd like to ask you did you tell yer mother about yer views and her stupidity 'cause she named ya Rama? if you didn't yet then may be you should and now since you've gained all the knowledge then you should get it changed. All you need is a Rs. 10 ka affidavit. This "all this is society manufactured" might be cool, may be beneficial for ya at max. but it's not meant and healthy for the whole society. Everything is society manufactured. Everyfuckinthing not just racism or sex discrimination are society manufactured concepts values of human life, mercy, charity, humanity all this is society manufactured. And Gangotri of this Ganga is RELIGION. It takes no great intelligence that RELIGION is also a society manufactured concept but we need things to tame the society and avoid chaos. When you think it's bad to rape a woman , or hurt someone or to kill the inocents. It's the RELIGION. Roots are way to more deeper than what you think. No matter how hard we try we can't think out of the box, we're always inside that box.
Roots of religion are way to more deeper than what you think, that's why yer name is Rama
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
composed by pranoo
woh yaad dhundhti hai
awaaz dhundti hai
jis mahal ke kinaro mein goonjte hai woh lavaz
unke thikane meri fariyaad dhundti hai
kin gaalion kin shehero mein talab dikhate
is ruh ki kin tasveeron se tadap bhujate
yeh sheher nahi hai mera
yeh jag nahi hai mera
yeh ganga jo nahi meri
kis nadikinare se hum yeh pyaas bhujate
kuch thahar sa gaya hai man mein
kuch ruk sa gaya aadmi mein
jhansi aur shivaji ke vansh yeh log
kyun dhoodhe victoria ka pyaar
kuch ghum gaya hai vyakti mein
kuch thum sa gaya us ruh mein
jo kabhi likte the inquilab zindabad
kyun aaj duniya jala rahe hai
en hatao mein jo asha thi
ek chingari hai dard ki
en aankhon mein jo farz tha
ek khwab hai maut ka
ruswa kar gayi hai aadmi ko insaaniyat
ruswa kar gaya aadmi bhi aapni niyat
kya baccha hai duniya mein
woh jo kabhi likhte the inquilab zindabad
aaj woh bhi jaala chuke hai.
NICE POETRY
awaaz dhundti hai
jis mahal ke kinaro mein goonjte hai woh lavaz
unke thikane meri fariyaad dhundti hai
kin gaalion kin shehero mein talab dikhate
is ruh ki kin tasveeron se tadap bhujate
yeh sheher nahi hai mera
yeh jag nahi hai mera
yeh ganga jo nahi meri
kis nadikinare se hum yeh pyaas bhujate
kuch thahar sa gaya hai man mein
kuch ruk sa gaya aadmi mein
jhansi aur shivaji ke vansh yeh log
kyun dhoodhe victoria ka pyaar
kuch ghum gaya hai vyakti mein
kuch thum sa gaya us ruh mein
jo kabhi likte the inquilab zindabad
kyun aaj duniya jala rahe hai
en hatao mein jo asha thi
ek chingari hai dard ki
en aankhon mein jo farz tha
ek khwab hai maut ka
ruswa kar gayi hai aadmi ko insaaniyat
ruswa kar gaya aadmi bhi aapni niyat
kya baccha hai duniya mein
woh jo kabhi likhte the inquilab zindabad
aaj woh bhi jaala chuke hai.
NICE POETRY
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Lost & found
I wake up, I go to my office. I look out.
I see people,
suited up people with PDAs,
happy people, same people, people with one point agenda "INCREMENT//BONUS"...
same happy people..same happiness everyday
same question pops up everyday..
what the fuck is the matter with these fuckin' scumbags.
what the fuck are they fuckin' happy about.
what the fuck are they satisfied with.
job.salary.cellphone.woman.weather.
living.standard.goverment.family.country
where the fuck they want to go?
US.Europe.
where the fuck have they arrived in past 24 hrs or 24 years.
It's weird !
riding on a random bus.
headin' to a destination X.
24..30..50 years
I see people,
suited up people with PDAs,
happy people, same people, people with one point agenda "INCREMENT//BONUS"...
same happy people..same happiness everyday
same question pops up everyday..
what the fuck is the matter with these fuckin' scumbags.
what the fuck are they fuckin' happy about.
what the fuck are they satisfied with.
job.salary.cellphone.woman.weather.
living.standard.goverment.family.country
where the fuck they want to go?
US.Europe.
where the fuck have they arrived in past 24 hrs or 24 years.
It's weird !
riding on a random bus.
headin' to a destination X.
24..30..50 years
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
